APRIL Hires Kim Carstensen: A Chance for Sustainable Practices and Eco-Friendly Products

Why Singapore Must Revamp Its Carbon Credit Rules for Quality Removals

Update Decoding Carbon Credits: What Singapore Needs to Know As Singapore prepares to bolster its carbon trading strategy, industry experts are voicing crucial insights about the future of carbon credits and the imperative for high-quality removals. In an interview with Lukas May, chief commercial officer of Isometric, a UK-based registry, it becomes clear that tightening carbon credit regulations is not merely an option; it's a prerequisite for scaling the demand for premium carbon removal credits in the city-state. Understanding the Current Landscape of Carbon Credits Singapore's carbon tax currently sits at S$25 (US$19) per tonne, slated to rise to S$45 (US$35) in 2026. This increase aims to encourage sustainable practices among businesses but may not be sufficient without a companion focus on ensuring the quality of carbon credits. At this stage, companies face little incentive to invest in high-quality removal strategies, such as nature-based solutions, if they can opt for significantly cheaper avoidance credits. Essentially, without advanced regulations, the potential for sustainable practices could stall. Lessons from Global Markets: What’s Working Elsewhere? Looking across the Atlantic, we see that Europe’s emissions trading schemes are evolving to incorporate carbon removals as a crucial part of their compliance frameworks. Isometric's Lukas May highlights that other governments, notably in the UK and EU, are exploring pathways for high-quality credits to substitute emissions allowances, presenting a model that Singapore might consider. This strategic shift could facilitate the growth of a green economy that prioritizes effective environmental impact. The Surge of Interest in Carbon Removals The demand for carbon removals has notably surged following revelations about the accuracy of rainforest offsets, prompting businesses to resource engineered removal credits—like biochar and mineralisation—which maintain higher durability and long-term climate benefits. Reports indicate that in 2025, these transactions increased by an astounding 102% compared to the previous year. However, these advanced projects often present higher upfront costs, typically four to five times that of avoidance credits, which further complicates the scenario for firms hesitant to invest financially. Driving Forces Behind the Demand for Quality In the context of corporate responsibility, tech giants like Microsoft and Meta are leading the charge, committing to support early-stage removal projects through initiatives worth over US$1 billion by 2030. While private-sector investment is critical, local governments must also create an environment that further incentivizes businesses to buy premium removal credits. This includes fostering regulations that clarify what constitutes a high-quality removal credit, effectively driving both transparency and responsibility. Future Considerations: What’s on the Horizon? As Singapore looks to strengthen its position as a leader in sustainability practices and environmental stewardship, several key factors should be considered. Firstly, establishing stringent guidelines for carbon credits can enhance public trust and encourage businesses to invest in quality over quantity. Secondly, the island nation must promote a culture of sustainability, integrating environmentally friendly practices into various sectors from construction to energy efficiency. Taking Action Together for a Sustainable Future Sustainability initiatives call for collective action; individuals, businesses, and governments all play a role. As consumers, we can choose eco-friendly products, support renewable energy innovations, and advocate for social responsibility within the market. The recent emphasis on climate-friendly policies showcases that by lowering our carbon footprints, adopting circular economy practices, and improving sustainability measures, we contribute to a broader movement toward a sustainable future. Singapore has an opportunity to lead by example, and now is the time for decisive actions. Conclusion: Uniting for Change In conclusion, Singapore stands at a crucial juncture concerning its carbon credit policies. As we learn from successful international models, implementing stricter regulations and emphasizing quality will be essential components of advancing a robust carbon market. In doing so, Singapore not only supports its own sustainability goals, but also sets an example that resonates globally. By fostering an eco-conscious culture, the nation can contribute meaningfully to combating climate change and promoting responsible consumption within the community.